Follow
                the Money, (part IV)
"Uptown Girl"
          Over several
              weeks, we’ve had the opportunity to scrutinize Rachel
            Kaprielian’s campaign finances. I won’t bother to conduct
            another detailed review. It’s enough to say that Kaprielian has
            yet to credibly answer the many serious questions that have been raised.
          So for
              now, let’s
          just pick up the saga where we left off.
          I ended
              my last column by mentioning that Rachel has engaged the services of
              a Boston born) Washington D.C. politico to manage her campaign. That
              person is Michael Moschello. Prior to this current effort, Mr. Moschello
              worked on the failed Gabrielli campaign. Before that, he was associated
              with the “New Democratic Network” (NDN) which is a Washington
            D.C. based “think-tank”.
          Let’s think about this folks: Rachel’s money comes from
            outside the district. Now, we find out her top campaign brass comes from
            outside the district. What’s she going to do next? Get her votes
            from outside the district?
          I  won’t bother discussing what Michael Moschello did with
            NDN. This column is not intended to be rap sheet about “D.C. Scooter,
            the Beltway Boy”. Like every other think-tank, NDN plots strategy.
            A bunch of elitist policy wonks sit around figuring out angels designed
            win over certain special interest voters. They search for just the right
            buzz-word or sound bite. They teach politicians how to speak, without
            saying anything, especially avoiding any direct answers to voters’ questions.
          That’s exactly what they’ve
              done for Rachel. Her new literature is a prime example.
            Recently, the Massachusetts Democratic Party sent out a series of mailings,
          on her behalf.  One flyer shows Rachel standing in front of our
            new library telling us that it makes common sense to take advantage of
            state grants. Well duh! No kidding! 
          Oh, Rachel
              plays it cute. She never comes out and says she got us the funding.
              But as they say, ‘a picture paints a thousand words’.
            The inference is clearly there.  
          The fact is, Rachel Kaprielian had little if anything to do with the
            library grant. Her biggest connection to our new library is in fact,
            infamous. At the grand opening, much to the embarrassment of those in
            charge, she weaseled her way to the podium even though she had neither
            been scheduled nor invited to speak. 
          For the record: The State legislature and Rachel Kaprielian did not
            vote for this funding.
            The grant for the library came from the Capital Budget, which is entirely
            controlled by the Governor.   Lt. Governor Healy, who has a long
            record of supporting libraries, was the one who went to bat for us. Governor’s
            Councilor Devaney, knowing this and having a working relationship with
            Kerry Healy, lobbied the Lt. Governor on Watertown’s behalf.  So
            much so, that when the grant money was approved, Healy called on Devaney,
            not Kaprielian to announce the good news to Watertown. 
          The bottom
              line: the credit actually belongs to Lt. Governor Healy and ultimately
              the Governor.   Kaprielian’s thinly veiled attempt
            to take credit for this grant only highlights her lack of accomplishments
            during her 12-year tenure. Moreover, what does it say about her character? 
          Let’s
          talk about that 12-year record. Shall we?
          With a
              $1 billion budget surplus in 2005, she voted to increase taxes another
              $85 million retroactively. How can she justify that? Seriously, “Uptown
            Girl”! The state took in more than enough money to fund the budget,
            why did you vote to increase taxes retroactively?  
            Tell us, is it some kind of instinct? Can we get you some help?
          According
              to Citizens for Limited Taxation (CLT), Rachel has voted for a billion
              dollars in tax increases. She actually got a 0 % rating from CLT.  That’s Zero percent!  That means it can’t
            get any worse! 
          And how
              does she want to spend our money? Hey! Let’s give illegal
            aliens in-state tuition subsidies.  
          Plain and
              simple, Rachel Kaprielian has lost touch with Watertown. Be it her
              failure to assist Lowell School parents trying to preserve a 50-year
              tradition or her abstention from a vote affirming the words “under
            God” in the pledge of allegiance, Rachel no longer espouses the
            core values of Watertown’s common sense majority. 
          So much
              for Watertown, what about Cambridge? The Democrats sent out a special
              mailing to those poor folks. Get this; it says  “Meet
            Rachel Kaprielian”. She’s been their state rep for 3 terms
            and the state committee has to send out a flyer that says “Meet
            Rachel Kaprielian”!  After 6 years! You’ve gotta to
            be kidding!  “Meet Rachel Kaprielian”??? How pathetic
            is that?
          Come to
              think of it, after 12 years of representing Watertown, that flyer would
              be just as appropriate here. We sure as heck don’t
            know who she is anymore.  I guess D.C. Scooter didn’t quite
            realize the extent of Uptown Girls estrangement. 
          This commentary
              concludes this series. I hope there’s no reason
            for a Sequel. Over the past few weeks, Kaprielian’s only response
            has been a blatant denial of facts in a recent TAB interview. This denial
            has  since been easily and quickly discredited.
          Will Rachel
              ever answer the serious and legitimate questions that have been raised?
              Why does so much of her money come from outside the district? Why did
              she take Big Dig Money-- Big Tobacco money? Why did she take a campaign
              contribution from someone who stood to gain financially from legislation
              she should have sponsored anyway? Will she release her tax forms so
              we can see just what she deducted? Why did she enlist   a
            Washington D.C. Politico to tell her how to talk to us ? Why did she
            forget about Watertown?
 
            
            If On Nov. 7th, Watertown   says  loud and clear, “Hey,
            Rachel !! Meet Watertown…”,  will Rachel even understand
            why?
          John DiMascio
           Communications
              Director
  Watertown Citizens for Common Sense Government
  www.citizensforcommonsense.com
            
           top
top