Follow
the Money, (part II)
We can sure Smell Smoke! — Common Sense
In my last column (Follow the Money
part 1), we took a surface look at
Rachel Kaprielian’s campaign finances. We talked about the incredible
amount in her war chest, noted the fact that 90% of the money comes from
outside the district, and we saw that Rachel is willing to take a contribution
from just about any lobbyist, no matter whom they represent.
Now, it’s time to dig deeper and see how the money she received
may very well have affected legislation.
Like most politicos these days, Rachel has a web site. It’s actually
very well done and has quite a bit of information regarding the legislation
Rachel writes, sponsors, and/or supports.
On a recent visit to Rachel’s site, I found that she is sponsoring
a great piece of legislation for our fire fighters.
Her web site reads as follows:
“Rachel is also the lead proponent of a bill to include bladder
cancer screening in the annual physicals for all firefighters, helping
to encourage early detection of the disease. Firefighters are at very
high risk for bladder cancer due to their regular exposure to toxic chemicals
contained in smoke”.
We should
all support this legislation. Firefighters put their lives at risk
for our sake. This is the very least we should do for them.
However, like many other aspects of Rachel’s record, there are
some serious questions that need answering. You see; the timing of this
legislation just happens to coincide with a peculiar pattern of contributions.
Please follow the timeline:
- 6/15/03 Stephen
Chubb of Matritech donates $100 to Rachel Kaprielian.
- 6/30/03 Chubb donates $500. to Attorney General Tom Reilly.
- 4/7/04 Chubb donates another $500 to Rachel Kaprielian.
As “lead proponent,” Rachel Kaprielian begins drafting
legislation that would, according to her web site, “include bladder cancer
screening in the annual physicals for all firefighters.”
- 12/7/04 Chubb donates $500 to Sal Dimasi, Speaker of the House.
- Jan.
2005 As “lead proponent,” Rep. Kaprielian files House
Bill 1636.
- 1/26/05 H1636 is referred to the Committee on Public Health.
- 4/19/05
Chubb gives $250 to Martha Coakley, Middlesex Co. D.A.
- 8/24/05 Chubb gives $500 to Sal Dimasi’s PAC.
- 11/10/05 - The Kaprielian bladder cancer bill passes the MA House,
148-0
- 11/15/05 - Kaprielian’s bill is referred to the Massachusetts
Senate, where it currently sits in the Ways and Means Committee.
Ok, so
what’s the big deal? Where is the problem? Who is Stephen
Chubb? What is Matritech?
Stephen Chubb runs Matritech, which “very coincidently” makes
bladder cancer screening kits. It stands to reason that if this legislation
passes, his firm stands to sell considerably more of the kits and thus
will experience significantly increased revenues.
Notice, The 4 people he chose to contribute to:
- Rachel
Kaprielian, the legislator who essentially wrote the bill
- The
Speaker of the House, without whose support, no piece of legislation
stands a chance of passing.
- The
District Attorney, who might have to investigate any quid-pro-quo.
- The
Attorney General, who is the top law enforcement official and has
the ability to call the shots when it comes to such an investigation.
Of course,
this could all be a series of innocent coincidences. On the surface,
it all appears to be legal. But we can sure smell smoke. Let’s
hope there is no fire.
My point
is this: we elect representatives and then pay them handsomely to do
the right thing. But, doing the right thing just doesn’t
seem to be enough for some people. This noble legislation was long overdue.
It is just a shame that it seemingly did not move forward until the gears
of a “pay to play” political machine were greased. Moreover,
it’s truly unfortunate all rational thinking voters must now question
Rachel’s real motivation is writing this bill.
Firefighters, their families, their neighbors, and their friends, should
all be concerned that Rachel accepted this money, thus tainting this
worthy effort. She could have just as easily asked Mr. Chubb to donate
the money to the Cancer Society or some charity dedicated to firefighters.
Instead, she took the money for her war chest which was already chockfull
of special interest money.
Rachel Kaprielian was first elected 12 years ago. I would imagine back
then she was full of ideals and ready to represent the people of Watertown.
But something happened to her after she got elected and over the last
12 years. She has become a poster child for everything negative Beacon
Hill has come to represent.
As I talk
to voters, the comments I hear about Rachel are all like these. “ She’s
walked away from us”. “We see her forcing her way to the
podium when she hasn’t been invited to speak”. “ We
only see her on Election Day passing out her cookies”. “I
can’t believe she campaigned to raise my property taxes last year”.
These are
powerful indictments from the voting public. And they’re
just based on her overt actions. Voters are just starting to learn about
her extreme left-wing voting record-- let alone her pandering to lobbyists
and special interests.
She has
forgotten who she is. She has forgotten where she came from. She’s
forgotten why she is there. She has forgotten the people who elected
her. Indeed, she has become just another well-oiled cog in a huge political
machine; fueled by special interest money.
She, without fail, is a follower and not the leader Watertown deserves.
The need for change is obvious. But for those of you who still doubt
it, there will be a third part in this series of commentaries. Next time
we will look at how Rachel Kaprielian managed to spend close to $20,000
campaigning in a non-election year.
Must be nice to have a slush fund. Stay tuned!
John DiMascio
Communications
Director
Watertown Citizens for Common Sense Government
www.citizensforcommonsense.com
top